Efforts to adopt sustainable value-based care (VBC) arrangements continues across the health care industry.
VBC arrangements are comprised of a spectrum of different types of agreements between VBC participants (i.e., government payors, commercial health plans, participating physician practices, and other VBC entities such as an Accountable Care Organization).
While meaningful strides have been made to date, many physician-led health care organizations across various practice settings—from small, independent practices to those employed in large integrated health systems—are looking for additional support to overcome key barriers and sustain momentum to improve the quality of health care delivered to their patients as well as to make care more affordable.
The AMA has numerous resources, developed by industry experts and validated by those with real-world experience, to help ease participation for physicians and their practices.
- Overarching guidance
Advancing the sustainable adoption of value-based care
While there is no single recommendation on how to best implement value-based care arrangements, the AMA, in collaboration with AHIP and the National Association of ACOs, has identified several best practices for value-based care that help ease participation and foster sustainable success.
Best practices for underlying payment methods
These economic incentives are intended to motivate changes in care delivery to further goals such as evidence-based, preventive, equitable, and coordinated whole person care. Creating a Sustainable Future for Value-Based Care: A Playbook of Voluntary Best Practices for VBC Payment Arrangements offers voluntary best practices for aligning payment with performance on quality, cost, and patient experience.
Best practices for data sharing
Intended for both current and future participants in value-based care arrangements, The Future of Sustainable Value-Based Care and Payment: Voluntary Best Practices to Advance Data Sharing offers voluntary best practices for overcoming key challenges associated with data sharing for value-based care arrangements that persist today.
Accountable Care Organizations: How to perform due diligence and evaluate contractual agreements
Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) have matured over the past several years. Participation in such entities, therefore, can pose complex and novel questions for physicians. Physicians interested in ACO arrangements must conduct due diligence to evaluate the opportunities available to them. To this end, the AMA has developed resources to help physicians navigate this process and understand their rights and obligations by providing this snapshot (PDF) covering topline issues to consider when partnering with an ACO, a model checklist (PDF) and a contractual guide (PDF) on ACOs to further supplement the due diligence process.
Venture capital and private equity investments
Venture Capital (VC) and Private Equity (PE) investors are increasingly investing in or acquiring physician practices. Physicians interested in these deals should consider the strategic implications of these transactions and be aware of their unique terms and conditions. The AMA has developed resources to help physicians navigate these opportunities and, if desirable, negotiate terms that reflect the practice’s goals and preferences, including a snapshot (PDF), model checklist (PDF) and a contractual guide (PDF).
Unwinding of an existing relationship: What you should know
Physicians, including independent physicians and those in group practices, who are contemplating or undergoing an unwinding of an existing relationship (like an employment contract, professional services agreement or a model integrating the physicians practice into another entity) with a health organization should be aware of key issues when negotiating with the other party. Review the model checklist (PDF) for top concerns you may encounter, find out how to evaluate contractual agreements (PDF) and download the snapshot of tools (PDF) you can use to unwind existing arrangements.
Deep dive FAQs for hospital-affiliated physicians
Information for physicians who are affiliated with a hospital and are considering participation in a value-based care arrangement (PDF).
- Navigating government programs
The building blocks of successful payment reform: Designing payment systems that support higher value care
A report developed by the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform describes a 10-step process (PDF) for developing such a business case and provides a detailed example for how to apply the process to an initiative to improve management of chronic disease patients. The report also describes the types of data that are needed to carry out all the steps in a good business case analysis.
Where do I fit in? Dividing the pie in new payment models
Learn about fee-for-value (FFV) (PDF) payment arrangements from how to transition to an FFV model to adopting payments innovations that reward high-value care.
Alternative Health Care Payment Models (APMs)
Prepare for changes happening through the Medicare Access & CHIP Reauthorization Act.
Access resources and information to understand Medicare payment and delivery reform under Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA).
Learn how seven potential alternative payment models (APMs) could help physicians in every specialty improve patient care, manage health care spending and qualify for APM annual bonus payments.
Evaluating Medicare Advantage value-based contracts
This resource describes issues (PDF) that physicians may encounter when contracting with Medicare Advantage (“MA”) Plans, including common contractual terms that are industry-standard or required by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and other terms that directly address value-based reimbursement.
Evaluating Medicaid value-based care models
The AMA offers extensive resources to help you navigate evolving physician payment and delivery models. Among these is “Evaluating Medicaid Value-Based Care Models,” which describes the new Medicaid models being implemented across the country, offers guidance for participation in these new programs, and identifies key elements that will affect physicians’ clinical practices moving forward.
- Participation in commercial arrangements
Is the pay-for-performance or the bundled payment model right for my practice?
Many commercial payers are pursuing pay-for-performance and bundled or episode-based, contracts with physicians. Determining whether either fits your practice begins with understanding their contracts. Download the new contract tools and learn:
- What these payment models are
- Which model concepts and contract issues you need to know
- How you can evaluate these models’ risks and effectiveness
Review information for evaluating pay-for-performance contracts (PDF) or bundled or episode-based contracts (PDF).
Direct-to-employer arrangements
Some employers are now contracting directly with physician groups to increase employee satisfaction and productivity while lowering the total cost of care for their employees using value-based incentives. To help physicians navigate this new payment and care delivery model, the AMA has created resources including case studies (PDF), a model checklist (PDF) and a snapshot (PDF) to inform physicians of the benefits and potential pitfalls of engaging in direct-to-employer arrangements.
- Research on physician practices
Effects of health care payment models on physician practice in the United States: Follow-up study
The AMA and the RAND Corporation recently conducted a follow-up study to their 2014 research on the effects of payment models on physician practices, hospitals and health plans in six distinct markets. Today’s new research reveals how the effects of participation in payment models have persisted, improved or further affected practices and organizations.
Effects of health care payment models on physician practice in the United States
A report from the RAND Corporation commissioned by the AMA took an in-depth look at the impact that various payment models have on physician practices, their professional lives and the delivery of patient care and assessed the impact of alternative payment models on practices and individual physicians.
